And now, education! (Sponsored by Toyota™, Pepsi™, and Tampax™)

You know, if our megalomaniacal government wasn’t hell-bent on continuing to dump billions of dollars down the toilet fighting wars which can’t be won, our funding-starved schools wouldn’t have to resort to sleazy corporate branding to survive.  (Apparently we’ll take smart bombs over smart kids any day.)  How soon before we’ll have Kentucky Fried Chicken™ Elementary School?  Verizon Wireless™ Junior High?  How would you like your kid to graduate from Depends Undergarments™ High School?  Don’t think it can’t happen.

Welcome to the Plymouth-Canton Elementary School, presented by Comerica.

That could be the reality in the Plymouth-Canton, Mich., school district, where administrators say their budget is so tight they had to approve the selling of naming rights to their new elementary school, existing schools, athletic field and even events.

A growing number of districts nationwide have or are setting up policies on how to handle corporate gifts that are attached to a name. It has raised questions about whether commercialism has gone too far.

Universities and hospitals are experienced in selling naming rights to corporations or individual donors. Communities have gotten into the game in the last several years, with ball fields and even senior centers selling naming rights to the highest bidder.

But public schools have been slow to join, in part because of the argument that kids at publicly funded schools shouldn’t be barraged at school by advertising. Still, some schools are trying.

The trend for a few years now has been to gain corporate sponsorship in exchange for some brand loyalty:  for example, Coca-Cola gives a school a bunch of money to have only Coke machines on campus.  Or Nike gives funding to a school if they slap their shoe ads all over walls, lockers, textbooks, etc.  It’s nothing new, but this business of naming entire schools after corporate donors is just sickening.  Aren’t these companies content with sports stadiums and concert venues named after them?  And what if your kid’s school receives a large chunk of money from a right-wing company like Carl’s Jr. or Wal-Mart, which then decides that all those science classes could use a good dose of religion (pardon me…intelligent design) in order to “balance things out”?  Oh no, that couldn’t happen.  Riiiight.

Once these companies own your schools, they may as well own the kids as well.  But who cares, it’s just a good old-fashioned business decision, nothing wrong with that…

0 thoughts on “And now, education! (Sponsored by Toyota™, Pepsi™, and Tampax™)

Add yours

  1. Why don’t they just pave over the entire world so they can just slap advertisments on it and be done with it. What’s next? Some night you’ll be looking at the moon and it will be flashing huge neon signs for the “Dukes of Hazzard” movie or for Coca-Cola or something.


  2. Not that I like the idea of corporate branding of schools – I don’t, but your analysis misses the mark for me on several points. First, war funding has not taken any money from the education budget. Second, most school funding takes place at the local level, as it should. This is the only way that parents can have a voice in what their children are being taught. More Federal dollars means more Federal mandates, means more goofy social indoctrination and less parental choice and acedemic excellence. At least that has been the pattern thusfar. Finally, from reading the article, it seems to me that the schools are chasing the corporate dollars as much or more than the corporations are pushing them. Ultimately, the individual, local school districts make these calls, not the Feds, or the corporations.
    By the way, there is no direct correlation between the amount of school funding and performance of students, except at the extreme low range.


  3. I believe the point is, schools cannot get state funding if the funding isn’t availble. Also money CAN affect education when textbooks are out of date and rain is leaking thru holes in the ceiling. Poorer schools have problems like this so some have to get money any way they can.


  4. Yeah, supposedly one of the greatest countries in the world and our educational system has to look for handouts (and it will really be henious if its from corporate shill-mongers)


  5. It won’t be too long before poorer countries are bought out by corporations and named. Pepsi, New Guinea or Nike, Africa.


Say it!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a website or blog at

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: